Okay, I'm quite annoyed by this point. The Eagles are 1-1, yet are higher-ranked than the Steelers. Okay, I can almost see that; they racked up some good numbers in their shootout loss to the Cowboys. Donovan McNabb looks fantastic, too. But the Steelers are 2-0, Willie Parker is having the season of his life so far, Hines Ward and the rest of the Pittsburgh receiver corps are at the top of their game, the offensive line has indeed improved in many respects and the Steelers' defense is simply shutting opponents down. So why, pray tell me, are so many of the talking heads picking the Eagles to win? And why do they have so many different reasons to do so?
It goes back to things like Don Banks picking the Steelers to go 8-8 and lose the division crown to the Browns. Whether blatant or subtle, there is an ingrained lack of respect for the Pittsburgh Steelers throughout the sports media. The slightest wobble, and the talking heads pounce, quick to condemn. But week after week of solid football, and are they as quick to praise? No. Teams like the Patriots and Cowboys can do no wrong. The Eagles come out and look solid in two games and suddenly jump ahead of a team with a better record. The best Sports Illustrated's Dr. Z can manage for the Steelers in his "power rankings"? Fourth, because he's making excuses for the Eagles. Fourth is a damn good place to be, but when you've got receivers who throw the ball away before scoring, and you put up 37 and still lose... no, you're not better at 1-1 than the Steelers are at 2-0. I can't lie about that twice in one post. Ordinarily I like Dr. Z a lot, but I think he's got his pants around his ankles here. Peter King, another guy I usually like, seems to think McNabb has suddenly become Superman. What the hell, guys?
Continue reading "Harumph."